[Ubuntu-manual] [UCLP] Content pool, and Meeting
Kyle Nitzsche
kyle.nitzsche at canonical.com
Wed Jul 7 18:48:38 UTC 2010
Resending with learning and manual lists included (oops ;)
cheers
On 07/07/2010 02:11 PM, Kyle Nitzsche wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Hi all,
>
> If I were considering a common format pool for various downstream users,
> I would want to be explicit about the following:
> * the key users are identified as stakeholders (individuals who
> represent the teams that consume the content)
> * stakeholders have an "official" methodology of governance of the
> common pool
> * stakeholder have identified their list of requirements
> * requirements include output formats, localization, scheduling
> (string freeze, translation)
> * there's a clear release management owner and process
> * a sufficiently rich tool chain must exist (proven/tested) for
> converting the common pool source format to the required delivery formats
> * common pool can be localized (text and images)
> * localization only needs to be done once (at the common pool level.
> Downstream users can ADD content while re-using existing localized content)
> * common pool has methodology for commit control (who can commit, and
> how do others participate)
> * common pool uses bzr and exists as an LP project with translations
> restricted to Ubuntu Translators
> * community portals are identified and used (email list, LP project,
> LP team, other)
>
> (I'd also want to specify that development of the common pool should be
> done *in* the common pool, not done elsewhere (downstream) and then
> imported (upstreamed) into it.)
>
> So, I wonder:
>
> What are the (current) required delivery formats by stakeholders. My
> guesses:
> * ubuntu-docs: mallard, xhtml, others?
> * ubuntu-manual: xhtml, pdf, others?
>
> What source format(s) and toolchain(s) supports these proposed requirements?
>
> Cheers,
> Kyle
>
>
> On 07/06/2010 07:02 AM, Luke-Jennings wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 07:36 -0500, Jim Campbell wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ryan Macnish<nisshh.ubuntu at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> Doesnt effect me at all, im fine with either saturday or
>>> sunday.
>>>
>>> Ryan Macnish
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Luke-Jennings
>>> <ubuntujenkins at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:37 +0100, Phil Bull wrote:
>>> > Hi guys,
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 12:00 -0400, Jason Cook wrote:
>>> > > I agree with both of you a meeting would be nice.
>>> I won't be available
>>> > > today (It's Canada Day!) and I doubt that many
>>> people will be able too
>>> > > attend this weekend (July 4th weekend). I think
>>> that the best time is
>>> > > on the weekend so maybe the 10th would work.
>>> >
>>> > The 10th would work for me.
>>> >
>>>
>>> mark cox has mentioned on the learning list, that it
>>> is ubuntu users day
>>> the times for it are
>>> Saturday July 10th 2010, 09:45 UTC - Sunday July 11th
>>> 2010, 03:00 UTC
>>> How does that effect people?
>>>
>>> -Luke
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The 10th would be better for me, too.
>>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Ok then lets say 8.00 pm utc on the 10th . #ubuntu-meeting is booked
>> then but that time usually works well for meetings. we could use
>> #ubuntu-manual as mootbot is there. unless anyone else has a better
>> suggestion.
>>
>> So it will be 8.00pm utc on the 10th in #ubuntu-manual times in your
>> area is [1].
>>
>> I have started an agenda here [2], if people can also add their
>> attendance to the bottom as well.
>>
>> Please feel free to add items please put your name by it so that we know
>> who's idea it was.
>>
>> Thanks all!
>>
>> Luke Jennings
>> (jenkins on #freenode)
>>
>> [1]http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=10&month=7&year=2010&hour=20&min=0&sec=0&p1=0
>> [2]http://pad.ubuntu-uk.org/collaborationmeeting
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the ubuntu-doc
mailing list