maverick release cycle docs.

[David Wonderly]

On Monday, July 05, 2010 04:39:04 pm Vikram Dhillon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 04:05:11PM -0400, Jonathan Jesse wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:52 PM, David Wonderly
> > 
> > <david.wonderly at kubuntu.org>wrote:
> > > I'm driving back home tomorrow. Ill be setting up a wiki sandbox for
> > > kubuntu docs. Let's start going through the docs and see what we can
> > > expand on.
> > > 
> > > Once I set it up ill email it to the list here... unless someone else
> > > wants to set it up.
> > > 
> > > DW
> > > 
> > > "David Wonderly" <david.wonderly at kubuntu.org> wrote:
> > > >To be honest I asked what we could do and Riddle said we need more
> > > >docs.
> > > >
> > > :) so, we will punch out more each release cycle till we are full.
> > > :
> > > >DW
> > > >
> > > >"Vikram Dhillon" <dhillonv10 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 09:31:20PM -0500, David Wonderly wrote:
> > > >>> Also I have commit rights. The one thing mentioned last kubuntu
> > > >>> meeting
> > > 
> > > was more docs. Review what we have and expand. :) Great to have you
> > > back.
> > > 
> > > >>> DW
> > 
> > What exactly was meant by more docs?  was it the Documentation in KDE
> > itself or more system documentation?  If it is KDE documentation then we
> > should be working with upstream instead of just adding into the Kubuntu
> > Docs package. Just curious as what was meant
> 
> Jonathan, I would like to say both, the upstream documentation is pretty
> outdated and I have been udpating that for quiet some time now but
> that's not enough each of those documents is like 18 pages long so its a
> pain to update all of that. We would probably need a lot of people
> working on that stuff to get in back in place.

To be totally honest they were talking Kubuntu Docs. While upstream are 
important we are talking about the Maverick release. I think that is what 
Riddle was referring to with that.

DW