request for review of Ubuntu 9.04 RC announcement
mdz at canonical.com
Thu Apr 16 09:14:02 UTC 2009
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 02:08:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 09:36:38AM +0100, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > [ARM] should be desktop only (no alternate), and there is no need to try to fit
> > it on releases (cdimage is most appropriate).
> Ok. Do we still want to be linking directly to cdimage.u.c from the
> announcement, in that case? Past experience suggests it will promptly fall
> over if we do.
OK, let's not do that then. Perhaps a separate announcement for ARM would
be most appropriate. I would very much like to get David's input on this
More information about the ubuntu-doc