Status of doc.ubuntu.com

[Cody A.W. Somerville]

I'm not sure if Jim already replied but I'm guessing it was a mistake since
I see a commit message showing him re-adding these changes.

Thanks,

Cody A.W. Somerville

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Matthew East <mdke at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Matthew East <mdke at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Feb 15, 2008 5:54 PM, Mathias Gug <mathiaz at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:57:43PM +0000, Matthew East wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Mathias Gug <mathiaz at ubuntu.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > Is there anyway to mark the documentation as being a Work In
> Progress ?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, it's easy to add a "draft" watermark to the documents - that
> > > > should already be done but if not we can arrange it.
> > >
> > > Browsing through a couple of pages [1][2] on doc.ubuntu.com, I don't
> see
> > > any draft watermark.
> >
> > Ok, I've committed a change to the xsl files in all of ubuntu,
> > kubuntu, xubuntu and edubuntu to show the draft watermark on all html
> > pages.
>
> Jim, I see you rolled back this change for xubuntu - is there a reason?
>
> Generally, when rolling back someone's commit, out of courtesy it is
> good practice to let them know the reason - if there is a good one it
> might also apply to other derivatives...
>
> --
> Matthew East
> http://www.mdke.org
> gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>



-- 
Cody A.W. Somerville
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20080222/6c879656/attachment.html>