vi or nano in tutorial?
mathenge at gmail.com
Fri Nov 30 18:58:09 UTC 2007
I also agree that you should say "text editor," but newbies may not know
what's available so you should list a few of them.
On Nov 30, 2007 1:50 PM, Eddie Martinez <eddiemartinez at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would agree with Michel and go with 'text editor, such as...'
> -Eddie M.
> On Nov 30, 2007 12:27 PM, Mathias Gug <mathiaz at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:38:05AM -0800, Michael Price wrote:
> > > From my understanding you are supposed to say text editor that way
> people have the option of using whatever they are comfortable with.
> > >
> > Makes sense so to me. There is a similar guideline for installing
> > packages: rather than saying "use apt-get to ...", the section should
> > refer to the InstallingSoftware wiki page.
> > I know of the following pages outlining style guides:
> > * https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WikiGuide/Style
> > * http://doc.ubuntu.com/styleguide/styleguide.html
> > Are there any other ressources ?
> > --
> > Mathias
> > --
> > ubuntu-doc mailing list
> > ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
> This has been an Eddie Martinez production.
> <Please exit in an orderly fashion>
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ubuntu-doc