BerylonEdgy guide
Travis Watkins
alleykat at gmail.com
Sat Oct 21 19:57:39 UTC 2006
On 10/21/06, Joseph Price <pricechild at gmail.com> wrote:
> For the binary nvidia .run:
> The use KNOWS what he is installing, wheras with the packages you have to
> trust the unsigned packages to be non-harmful and built well.
> In the event of the kernel upgrade, the user can simply re-run the file to
> recompile the module, wheras those using amaranth's packages may have to
> wait a while for him to rebuild.
The binary .run also seems to end up broken when mesa is upgraded but
doesn't make it obvious why it broke.
--
Travis Watkins
http://www.realistanew.com
More information about the ubuntu-doc
mailing list