Oops, re aptitude : was [Re: Edgy in the news]

[Michael T. Richter]

On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 18:00 -0500, Eric Dunbar wrote:

> I think the *.ubuntu.com domain is part of the legitimacy problem.
> ANYTHING under *.ubuntu.com will be treated as gospel by a sizeable
> number of people (myself included -- I wasn't aware that that section
> was NOT official Ubuntu documentation).


Would it be too practical to suggest domain names like "ubuntu.com",
"ubuntucommunity.com" and so on to show the differences?

-- 
Michael T. Richter
Email: ttmrichter at gmail.com, mtr1966 at hotpop.com
MSN: ttmrichter at hotmail.com, mtr1966 at hotmail.com; YIM:
michael_richter_1966; AIM: YanJiahua1966; ICQ: 241960658; Jabber:
mtr1966 at jabber.cn

"Thanks to the Court's decision, only clean Indians or colored people
other than Kaffirs, can now travel in the trams." --Mahatma Gandhi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20061102/0ddbb2ab/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20061102/0ddbb2ab/attachment.pgp>