Repositories, archive, sources, components, categories...

[Sebastian Heinlein - glatzor]

Am Sonntag, den 28.05.2006, 14:35 +0100 schrieb Matthew East:
> On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 21:31 +0800, Jerome Gotangco wrote:
> > Well in all honesty, we (me, mvo, glatzor) did discuss it before in
> > the desktop channel but was only limited for g-a-i itself, but yes,
> > this should have been distributed all throughout (apologiies).
> > 
> > Not to mention stuff like this is a shoo-in for the styleguide.
> 
> Well, I think that if a decision has really been taken to change the
> vocabulary used for something like this, it should have been decided by
> the technical board and implemented throught the distribution. Having
> one word for the g-a-i tools and one word for the rest of the world is
> really not helpful.
> 
> Matt

I wrote to the devel list about this issue some monthes ago. Nobody
replied. So what should I have done? I also nagged many people on IRC.

https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2006-March/016358.html

I used the strings of the specs that I found on the wiki. See above. I
could not know that the spec used strings that were not approved.

Regards,

Sebastian