What style for graphical sequences (eg, 'System > Administration > Services')?

[Mike MacCana]

OK, we have a standard. I'll file a bug and correct anything I see using
anything else.

Should this be made more apparent as well? In much the same way code is
written in a breakout box, to make it obvious that this is something they
do, and not part of the instructions?

Apple and Microsoft usually just bold things. I think that'd be a good
solution for Ubuntu too.

Mike

On 6/24/06, Matthew East <mdke at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> * Matt Galvin:
> > On 6/22/06, Mike MacCana <mike.maccana at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> System -> Administration -> Services
> >
> > In the docs we fairly uniformly use the above style, although yes we
> > should add this to the style guide. Could you please file a bug about
> > it?
> >
> > https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+filebug
>
> Yes, I agree we should add it. Even better, file the bug here -
> https://launchpad.net/products/ubuntu-doc/+filebug
>
> Matt
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFEnFbLtSaF0w5rBv8RAt4qAKCDlZxbddIbP8EvggELetYrfR1GkACfdX7o
> mmBqKGJl/+impfbR3YrkSxQ=
> =7nOx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20060624/681c56b2/attachment.html>