Categories on the new wiki

[Duncan Lithgow]

On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 12:28 +0100, Matthew East wrote:

> 
> Sorry for spamming this thread, but I should add that, while I don't
> think necessarily that Categories will be particularly useful to
> identify different content on the wiki, I definitely think Categories
> have a role to play in the separate question of quality assurance, and I
> think we should definitely think about a sophisticated system for
> employing categories to inform users of how reliable the page is.
I think this function is definitely one where categories could be
useful. For example a page I plug away at every now and then
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Firewire should be 'tagged'/
categorised as 'incomplete' or 'unreviewed' or whatever. Some tag that
all pages start with by default might be a good idea.

I think also that any system of subject categories (as opposed to
reliability) should be reflected in the website structure. So the page I
mentioned above should be at
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Video/Firewire

this also makes more sense to search engines.
-- 
Linux user: 372812 | GPG key ID: 21A8C63A | http://lithgow-schmidt.dk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20060705/f461cc99/attachment.pgp>