Improving Ubuntu Help/Docs part 1 of 3

[David Tangye]

Thanks for your thoughts. Points below.

On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 11:55 +0800, Jerome Gotangco wrote:
> David, while most of the points you have raised are valid, your may
> have missed the fact that the documentation project is purely
> voluntary 
No, I am fully aware of this. My point is that M$ etc ppl are paid, but
SO WHAT, that MUST have nothing to do with us not insisting that our
stuff is every bit as good or better if we are to win the customers
over.
> and the people involved do care that what they have written
> works for the first time, if not after numerous revisions (we wont
> reach rev 2900+ on svn if no work has been done). That's why they have
> asked for feedback on all channels and even created 2 websites for
> this:
I plan to address the issue of duplication in part 3.

> It is also a vicious cycle - doc writers catch up on all the changes
> with short notice
I also plan to address this in part 3.