Questions on Documentation on the wiki

[Matthew East]

On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 16:29 -0700, Matt Kirchhoff wrote:
> Quoth Troy Williams on 10/26/2005 4:07 PM:
> > In my mind it would make sense to add the specific Kubuntu details to that 
> > same page (CDRipping) just because I don't distinguish the distribution by 
> > the DE, but that may not be the way users in general look at it.
> > 
> 
> I'm one who sees the two as distinct. To me, Kubuntu is a version of
> Ubuntu for those already familiar enough with Linux desktops to have a
> preference.
> 
> As such, most new users will gravitate towards Ubuntu, and we shouldn't
> confuse them by mixing documentation from each.
> 
> Vote++ for wiki.kubuntu.org.

I am strongly opposed to this.

Kubuntu and Ubuntu use most of the same packages, and there is such an
overlap between lots of them that many guides and docs on the wiki are
common to both. Yes, some kubuntu specific docs are needed, but nothing
stops people from writing them.

Having one wiki for both does not in any way impede the development of
kubuntu docs, IMHO.

Matt
-- 
mdke at ubuntu.com
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20051027/501fbc07/attachment.pgp>