Conversion of Quicktour to Docbook

[Matthew East]

On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 00:35 -0700, Corey Burger wrote:
> Sean,
> 
> I wondered why you did this. The Quicktour was much much easier to
> hack in XHTML and was translatable. XHTML is also much more likely to
> be known by the nascent marketing team than DocBook. In other words, I
> don't see any gain from it frankly.

Agreed. Undiscussed major changes like this disturb our work

Sean, either work with us, or not at all, please.

Matt

-- 
mdke at ubuntu.com
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20051020/1570124f/attachment.pgp>