Sec: Unclassified RE: proposal for our repository structure post-breezy

Matt Kirchhoff mek at somnonym.org
Tue Oct 18 01:14:02 UTC 2005


On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 09:49 +1000, Stoffers, Robert LAC wrote:
> I don't see the point at this stage from moving away from docbook, so lets keep that for now (I am interested to see what happens with project Mallard though). If gnome-doc-utils is going to make our lives easier then I am all for it. 
> 
> The other major issue that has been bought up is switching from subversion to baz, the only issue I have (keep in mind I have never used baz) is that baz makes it easier for people to fork documents whenever they want to. If people decide not to work as part of the team and/or fail to communicate with others properly (which has happened in the past) this will be a bad thing for moral and the docteam in general. I think we can all work professionally and this won't be an issue, but it is something we have to keep in mind before deciding to switch. 
> 
> I also think the current structure of our repository is a mess. I think we should lay it out something like this (off the top of my head):

For someone like me who's gotten involved somewhat recently, your
proposed structure makes a lot more sense; the current structure is
definitely more convoluted.

--
Matt Kirchhoff





More information about the ubuntu-doc mailing list