possible documentation viewer?
Sean Wheller
sean at inwords.co.za
Fri Jun 3 14:38:43 UTC 2005
On Friday 03 June 2005 16:25, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > I have put in place a solution that works without making compounding
> > problems for anyone else.
>
> It creates compounding problems for the distribution, and our ability to
> work with upstream. Instead of solving the help problem, it compounds it by
> taking Ubuntu off in a different direction to everyone else.
Please check /usr/share/doc for *.html You will find many documents in HTML
format. Why is it so wrong for ubuntu-docs to do the same if it is common
for projects to package HTML.
example:
* Dive into python
* Debian FAQ
* Debian doc-base Manual
* libgnomevfs2
BTW. In Hoary we release Ubuntu Quick Guide as XML and HTML
Yelp is a *GNOME* help viewer for *GNOME Documents* on *GNOME Apps*.
Not all projects supply gnome compliant XML and so they package HTML. There is
nothing wrong with that. What matters is that the users can get to help.
Ubuntu docs are not GNOME per se. They also cover debian stuff and things
about some non GNOME apps.
> This is not a
> solution to the problem *or* a desireable strategy for us, or for any of
> our upstreams.
If a document is a gnome document, like the Ubuntu Device Database I have
created it as a gnome doc using gnome standards. This app and its doc are
already in GNOME CVS, without problem I believe. So yes we are working with
upstream when it is feasible to do so.
--
Sean Wheller
Technical Author
sean at inwords.co.za
084-854-9408
http://www.inwords.co.za
Registered Linux User #375355
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20050603/e035f213/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ubuntu-doc
mailing list