Packaging Guide License

[Matthew East]

On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 10:16 +0000, Matthew East wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 19:35 -0800, Jordan Mantha wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >    After a discussion with mpt and Madpilot on #ubuntu-doc I have become 
> > concerned about the license for the Ubuntu Packaging Guide. I took the 
> > guide from a doc done by Ankur Kotwal for the MOTU. The .deb package has 
> > a GPL license so assume that the doc is GPL'd. This means that the 
> > Ubuntu Packaging Guide needs to be GPL'd. I believe that it was GPL'd 
> > because it includes quite  a bit of material from the Debian New 
> > Maintainer's Guide. However, it also had quite a bit from the Ubuntu 
> > wiki (which is not GPL ?). At this point I am wondering what the best 
> > way to go is. Can the Ubuntu Packaging Guide be GPL'd considering the 
> > wiki content? Should the whole thing be rewritten? I am not opposed to 
> > that but it would be some work.
> 
> No, I think that is absolutely fine. The wiki is a free for all (IMO). I
> think the GPL makes sense.

clarification: I think the GPL makes sense _for the packaging guide_.
Not the wiki, on which see the spec.

Matt

> We're working on making the wiki licence a bit clearer: see
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WikiLicensing

-- 
mdke at ubuntu.com
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20051203/2fa481b4/attachment.pgp>