Packaging Guide License
Matthew East
mdke at ubuntu.com
Sat Dec 3 10:16:00 UTC 2005
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 19:35 -0800, Jordan Mantha wrote:
> Hi all!
> After a discussion with mpt and Madpilot on #ubuntu-doc I have become
> concerned about the license for the Ubuntu Packaging Guide. I took the
> guide from a doc done by Ankur Kotwal for the MOTU. The .deb package has
> a GPL license so assume that the doc is GPL'd. This means that the
> Ubuntu Packaging Guide needs to be GPL'd. I believe that it was GPL'd
> because it includes quite a bit of material from the Debian New
> Maintainer's Guide. However, it also had quite a bit from the Ubuntu
> wiki (which is not GPL ?). At this point I am wondering what the best
> way to go is. Can the Ubuntu Packaging Guide be GPL'd considering the
> wiki content? Should the whole thing be rewritten? I am not opposed to
> that but it would be some work.
No, I think that is absolutely fine. The wiki is a free for all (IMO). I
think the GPL makes sense.
We're working on making the wiki licence a bit clearer: see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WikiLicensing
M
--
mdke at ubuntu.com
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20051203/ae4eb854/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ubuntu-doc
mailing list