Maybe FAQs aren't very useful

[George Deka]

your email was off-list.

On 4/20/05, whorush at comcast.net <whorush at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> george, i'm a bit lost on this email.
> 
> breezy?
> 
> then in this email you say...
> 
> Fine to have a structure like this, but honestly if we try fill it we wont 
> meet breezy.
> Not unless we have more bloody (new and old - most of the founding members 
> have left because of all of this political discussion)
> 
> bloody and breezy? are these new documentatoin releases? i guess this is 
> some ubuntu lingo? political discussion?


What i meant was blood, breezy is the new development release of ubuntu.

why don't you like about ubuntuguide? i'm not defending it, i barely know 
> it, why is it dodgy? i like the structure and the organization, we dont have 
> to make anything like it or use it in anyway. my point is just that its 110% 
> more organized than this site.


Some of the information of there is not of great quality, eg install 
limewire when there is a perfect open source client out there - gift

i started a wiki page for proposed hierarchies for the documentation. give 
> it a look, the stuff i have there is pathetic, but its just an idea of how 
> i'm thinking.
> 
> https://www.ubuntulinux.org/wiki/ProposedHierarchy
> 
> be excellent to eachother, brad


Thats fine, but can we fill it all in, by the time breezy realeases
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20050420/32a13d4b/attachment.html>