Ubuntu Guide
matthew.east at breathe.com
matthew.east at breathe.com
Tue Apr 19 16:24:10 UTC 2005
Hello there,
I work in the Ubuntu Documentation Team, and I was looking through your site
(http://www.ubuntuguide.org) recently. I am slightly concerned that some of
the content is misleading and I wanted to bring it to your attention:
The first thing that really concerns me is that all users are instructed to
add the backport repositories and the marillat repositories (stable,
unstable AND testing), regardless of the programs which they need to
install. As you may know, this causes several conflicts between packages
which appear in both repositories (for example mplayer, which appears in
several marillat repositories as well as ubuntu universe).
I have encountered several cases on irc recently where this has caused users
systems to break.
A further thing that I noticed (I did not read the whole guide) was that you
advise users to disactivate initscripts in a way which violates debian
policy and can cause problems if users wish to use a proper method of
altering their initscript services. For further information please see this
document: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s-sysvinit
I hope that you will be able to take these comments into account and amend
the guide accordingly!!
Something that struck me is that if the guide could be brought into the
context of the Ubuntu Documentation Team, better quality control of the
document would ensue, and from our point of view, we would be able to
improve the quality of the local documentation supplied with the Ubuntu
system.
What are your thoughts? I look forward to your reply!
warm regards, Matthew.
More information about the ubuntu-doc
mailing list