Action Items for Document Processing Scheme for doc team.

John Hornbeck hornbeck at
Thu Nov 18 17:22:50 UTC 2004

On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 08:31 -0800, Matt Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:53:15 +0200, Sivan Green <sivan at> wrote:
> > Hey all,
> > 
> >  So...after all the good discussion, how shall I go about this issue?
> > Plesae refer to my post with the proposed plan...we should get going...
> Here's a summary of the thoughts from the prior thread:
> - Users shouldn't have to verify with us before posting docs on the
> wiki; requiring that would make extra work for us and would likely
> discourage people from posting. The wiki should be a virtual rough
> draft.
> - There should be *some* quality control mechanism, however. Sounds
> like we want edited/polished docs to be moved to an "official" area,
> such as the svn DocBook repository.
> So I guess now the process by which docs are verified and moved into
> svn needs to be defined.
> -- 
> Matt Kirchhoff
Well I think Matt summed most of it up.  We should create a page for
"proposed docs to be moved", we could list docs here and say if they
should go to docbook, or to the main site.  We can than sign off on each
page and after said page has at least three sign off's we move it.  Does
that sound good?  I think this would be the best way of moving docs into
main stream.

John Hornbeck
Ubuntu Documentation Team
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <>

More information about the ubuntu-doc mailing list