Fwd: Re: Subversion - Proposal

Sean Wheller sean at inwords.co.za
Sun Dec 26 07:40:34 UTC 2004


On Sunday 26 December 2004 04:43, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > <snip what="proposal-outline"/>
> >
> > > This all sounds good, and I think it would be a smart way to move when
> > > we move the repository.  I am really hoping for a move soon as the
> > > hardware it is on right now seems to not be handling the load very
> > > well.  If anyone has a solution for moving this soon please let us
> > > know, and if any Canonical people can help please do.
> >
> > OK that's one in agreement. Any others.
> > Regarding hosting. I think it should be at Canonical.
>
> Summary of my reply (it seems like I write too much, so I'll try making
> summaries :) :

Enrico,

John brought SVN up and I did co
Then I merge my changes to SVN HEAD
Now you have a a big patch in bugzilla
https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4978

I was going to do on per file basis but decided not to. To many problems with 
the SVN src.
-- 
Sean Wheller
Technical Author
sean at inwords.co.za
http://www.inwords.co.za
Registered Linux User #375355
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20041226/752b12bd/attachment.pgp>


More information about the ubuntu-doc mailing list