Documentation Licensing and Its Discontents

[Benj. Mako Hill]

On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 08:48:53AM +1100, George Deka wrote:
> It all sounds good, appart from some documentation will have to be
> kept GPL, because the source is GPL.

Sure.

> If we want to feed upstream to debian, the 2 licences you have
> mentioned will fail.

I suspect that this might/will change for either or both of the
licenses in question in the near future.

Regards,
Mako

-- 
Benjamin Mako Hill
mako at canonical.com