Users guide vs Quickguide

[Corey Burger]

Baz is not that much harder to use than svn, and the distributed
nature is cool. I plan to write a tutorial before the 4th of January
(when I go back to work), thus it will be easy. In addition baz is
getting better everyday.

So in a word, no I won't sponsor their packages. Let us go forward
with svn and then slowly switch over to baz.

Corey


On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:59:38 +0200, Sivan Green <sivan at piware.de> wrote:
> Corey Burger wrote:
> 
> >I just chatted with lu about the an official baz archive. I stress
> >that I don't want to step on any toes and would like to make the
> >transition as painless as possible.
> >
> >My thought (a certainly not something that anyone should take as
> >anything else) is that we move the quickguide to baz and leave the
> >already done docs on svn for now.
> >
> >Thus we can move the rest of the it when needed and wanted.
> >
> >Thoughts?
> >
> >Corey
> >
> >
> >On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:11:11 +0100, Corey Burger <corey.burger at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I had not meant to activate such a huge debate. It was merely a talking point.
> >>
> >>Therefor, we go forward as it is. I will continue to work on the
> >>quickguide as a per program tool.
> >>
> >>However, I will need commit access to the svn repository for now.
> >>However, we should push lu to get us an arch repo so that we can move
> >>forward with that.
> >>
> >>Corey
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> What happens if someone who is not comfrotable with baz wants to
> contribute on the quick guide? will you sponser his patches?
> 
> SIvan
>