Using lp:udd beyond its original purpose

[Martin Pool]

(re-send)

On 8 December 2011 07:13, Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:
>> There are two big changes that aren't necessary for us, but would help a lot:
>>  1. Decouple lp:udd from the package-import.canonical.com production deployment
>>  2. Split the package scanning and the branch importing parts of
>> lp:udd into separate projects
>
> That sounds good to me, especially #1.  I would much rather have the
> splitting merged back upstream than to have the tree forked.
>
> --
> Martin