Meeting minutes and possible meeting time change

[Barry Warsaw]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Apr 12, 2011, at 01:29 PM, John Arbash Meinel wrote:

>1100 UTC is excellent for me :). 2100UTC is about 11pm for me, which is
>possible, but a bit unlikely. My family is certainly usually asleep
>before 10, but lately so am I.

If there are no objections, I'm certainly willing to give it a shot.  I know
that Scott K said the time will be less convenient for him, which is
unfortunate, but I still think we should run an experiment with the new time.
If we don't like it, we can change it back.  Or perhaps we'll want to
alternate to get better coverage.

Martin, I think you own the gcal event.  Can you make the change so that we're
meeting at 1100 UTC for the next meeting (20-Apr)?

Cheers,
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=9trP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----