Bazaar focus for 2.1 and 2.2

Jelmer Vernooij jelmer at canonical.com
Mon Dec 21 13:39:19 GMT 2009


Le jeudi 17 décembre 2009 à 19:41 -0600, John Arbash Meinel a écrit : 
> >> This would make the memory leaks less of
> >> a problem, and it should make the scheduling of code imports a bit
> >> fairer, since large branches would not keep the system busy for a long
> >> time. 
> > 
> > It would also need some work so that we don't publish an import until
> > the import actually finishes, I think that would be quite confusing.
> > 
> >> The overhead of resuming an existing import should be relatively small.
> > 
> > Yeah.  Let's talk about this in Wellington if we don't get to it before
> > then :-)
> I should note that *imports* should be different, and checkpointing
> every so often is a good thing. (InterDifferingSerializer writes to disk
> every 100 revs, triggering an autopack every 1000 revs or so.)
I've made bzr-svn and bzr-git fetch revisions in batches as well, but
this doesn't seem to have a significant effect on the memory usage. Do I
need to do more than calling start_write_group() / commit_write_group()
every X revisions ?

Cheers,

Jelmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-distributed-devel/attachments/20091221/1e2eed07/attachment.pgp 


More information about the ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list