Bazaar focus for 2.1 and 2.2
Michael Hudson
michael.hudson at canonical.com
Fri Dec 18 02:23:23 GMT 2009
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 19:41 -0600, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
>>>> This would make the memory leaks less of
>>>> a problem, and it should make the scheduling of code imports a bit
>>>> fairer, since large branches would not keep the system busy for a long
>>>> time.
>>> It would also need some work so that we don't publish an import until
>>> the import actually finishes, I think that would be quite confusing.
> Is it really problematic if an import is behind on the foreign branch
> while it is being filled in, rather than being empty as is the case now?
Hm, true. Some effort in the UI would probably make this ok.
Cheers,
mwh
More information about the ubuntu-distributed-devel
mailing list