<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 10/11/2012 11:56, Alessio Treglia a écrit : </div> <blockquote cite="mid:CAMHuwozDEiexkVC-AX+guukzz0cCZuvPRvRX8TsY4RRJFCPFDg@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Sebastien Bacher <<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:seb128@ubuntu.com">seb128@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote: > getting glew in... do you think that's something you could do? (using a ppa > for that testing should work as well) Of course it is, I will do it ASAP </blockquote> The new glew makes unity FTBFS: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://launchpadlibrarian.net/122827901/buildlog_ubuntu-raring-i386.unity_6.12.0-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz">https://launchpadlibrarian.net/122827901/buildlog_ubuntu-raring-i386.unity_6.12.0-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz</a> This is blocking the unity SRU as well having the same bugs fixed waiting for being available in raring first. I think we should revert glew in proposed right now and then, coordinate again for a new upload, with the unity changes as well. What do you think? Cheers, Didier </body> </html>