<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> * Fixed top post On 10/25/2011 03:25 AM, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Micah Gersten wrote: > >> On 10/25/2011 02:25 AM, Nicolas Valcarcel Scerpella wrote: >>> aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low >>> >>> * Merge from debian unstable. Remaining changes: >>> - debian/control: change Build-Depends from libreadline5-dev to >>> libreadline-dev for readline transition. >>> >>> aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2) unstable; urgency=low >>> >>> * Non-maintainer upload. >>> * debian/control: Build-Depend on libreadline-gplv2-dev instead of >>> libreadline5-dev. (Closes: #553726) >>> * src/Makefile.am, src/Makefile.in: Apply patch from Ubuntu to >>> remove unknown -avoid-version from LDFLAGS. (Closes: #628245) >>> >>> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 02:20:08 -0500 >>> Changed-By: Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:nicolas.valcarcel@canonical.com"><nicolas.valcarcel@canonical.com></a> >>> Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com"><ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com></a> >>> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/aptsh/0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1">https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/aptsh/0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1</a> >>> >> This doesn't seem right, can you please reupload with the libreadline >> that Debian used and a note that it should be sync'd next time unless >> there's a reason to override Debian's libreadline choice? >> >> Thanks, >> MIcah > We don't have that readline in our archive, i assume it's just a weird > debian naming thing > rmadison libreadline-gplv2-dev libreadline-gplv2-dev | 5.2-9ubuntu1 | oneiric | amd64, armel, i386, powerpc libreadline-gplv2-dev | 5.2-11 | precise | amd64, armel, i386, powerpc Please fix :) Thanks, Micah </body> </html>