<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:32 PM, LI Daobing <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lidaobing@gmail.com">lidaobing@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> <div class="im">On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 20:07, Benjamin Drung <<a href="mailto:bdrung@ubuntu.com">bdrung@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote:<br> > Am Sonntag, den 28.03.2010, 17:07 +0800 schrieb Zhengpeng Hou:<br> >> So I'd suggest to have ibus-1.3 pulled into Lucid from Debian<br> >> experimental. Since this new upstream release<br> >> will have abi transition, therefore I prefer to discuss this more<br> >> before filing FFe.<br> ><br> > Which packages depends on ibus? Do they compile against ibus-1.3?<br> ><br> </div>ibus-pinyin, ibus-m17n, ibus-chewing, ibus-anthy depends on the C API<br> of ibus (which changed from ibus 1.2 to ibus 1.3), and the python api<br> does not change from 1.2 to 1.3, so ibus-anthy, ibus-table and other<br> packages does not need a new version. </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> <br> there is a ppa for ibus 1.3:<br> <a href="https://launchpad.net/~ibus-dev/+archive/ibus-1.3-lucid" target="_blank">https://launchpad.net/~ibus-dev/+archive/ibus-1.3-lucid</a><br> <br> ibus-anthy for 1.3 still not released yet, maybe we need package the<br> git version.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It should be ibus-hangul. Anthy does not have any problem.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Peng Huang</div><div> </div></div>