-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I just noticed the discussion that was started about putting Wine into main, so I figured I'd jump in with my two cents. I agree that there would be some great advantages to having Wine officially supported, and that it would be great to make Wine usage easier for new users. However, I'm not so sure that having it installed by default would be the best approach. As Mr. Ritchie states, 10% of Ubuntu users have Wine installed. I myself have it installed on one of my systems. However, I'd not want it installed on any of my other systems. Perhaps the method we use for Flash installation would work well for Wine. When a new user visits a website that utilizes Flash, they are notified that they need new software to run the content, and are offered to automatically have it installed. Perhaps when the new user clicks on the .EXE file, they could be notified with a window that explains the differences between software installation on Windows and Ubuntu, introduces them to Wine, and gives them the option to automatically install Wine and use it to run the .EXE they clicked. In addition, perhaps it would be possible to integrate a feature that pulls info about that Windows program from WineHQ.org, and tells them the probability of the program working well. I'm not sure if this last bit would be possible or not, but it would be a nice addition. I think the approach I just outlined would be the best compromise, allowing new users to easily run Windows software, while not mandating that all users have Wine installed. Douglass Clem <a href="http://crashsystems.net">crashsystems.net</a> Public Key: <a href="http://crashsystems.net/pubkey.asc">http://crashsystems.net/pubkey.asc</a> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: <a href="http://getfiregpg.org">http://getfiregpg.org</a> iEYEARECAAYFAklH0xkACgkQJzGr8ihABf6b3QCfc/o7az/Lkscp7ONmkBnUxX/Y C30AnipTulU2aygOu89a93ni7LvrsL+Z =x+W5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----