Ah yes good point.  Well perhaps using the PPA to look over everything but version number then would be in turn?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Nov 20, 2007 10:17 AM, Scott Kitterman <<a href="mailto:ubuntu@kitterman.com"> ubuntu@kitterman.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">On Tuesday 20 November 2007 10:42, Mario Limonciello wrote: <br><br>> Another idea I was proposing was maybe requiring it to be sent to an<br>> ~ubuntu-dev or ~motu PPA.  I say a team PPA because then you won't be<br>> filling up your already possibly in use personal PPA that people might <br>> subscribe to who don't need the fix yet.   Typically you aren't looking for<br>> linda/lintian/packaging changes on an SRU but instead you want<br>> functionality.  This could then lower the barrier for people having to do <br>> large SRU builds locally since they could just wget the debs from the team<br>> PPA.  Also, could SRUs be cross pocket copied over from the PPA to<br>> -proposed this way?<br><br></div>I think cross-sopying would require the PPA upload to use the actual proposed <br>version number, but I don't think you can do successive uploads to a PPA with<br>the same version number, so I don't think this would be a good idea, even if<br>it is possible.<br><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"> <br>Scott K<br><br>--<br>ubuntu-devel mailing list<br><a href="mailto:ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel" target="_blank"> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel</a><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Mario Limonciello<br><a href="mailto:superm1@gmail.com">superm1@gmail.com</a>