Isn't the definition of spec something along the lines of "something I would like to see in the next distribution"?  Or do you really want every user out there to start filing every feature request there? Specs are for planning and implementing features... <div>On 11/15/06, Forest Bond <<a href="mailto:forest@alittletooquiet.net">forest@alittletooquiet.net</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 03:47:00PM -0800, Constantine Evans wrote: > Forest Bond wrote: > >These issues look like they may be better handled by filing bugs against the > >bash package on launchpad. > Will anyone actually look at these bugs though? There are quite a few > old bugs in vim that are requests for configuration enhancements, and > there aren't nearly enough people looking at them to actually make a > decision. Well, that's a different problem, and one that also needs solving.  Based on what you've said, I remain unconvinced that there is a relatively large horde of spec reviewers that will quickly deal with the collection of should-be bug reports inappropriately crammed into a spec on the wiki. -Forest -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFWxvyRO4fQQdv5AwRAvC6AJ9LJRF6PBCQKPTyZH2ecZBtKU+mCACg1AuD JojgoP7eYOZio0xW1xVA5CY= =oiWZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel</a> </blockquote></div>