My point was is that there is a reason it is called a technical <span style="font-weight: bold;">board</span>, because Mr. Garrett does not have veto power, and if he did I am sure it would be listed on the page I correctly linked to. Also with respect to support, usplash was already given, but doesn't it cost many more man hours in support for a totally broke suspend function that has not worked on any computer I have tested it on? Lets be real here, the only thing you guys are really providing is
<span style="font-weight: bold;">stop energy.</span><br style="font-weight: bold;"><br><br>Steven J Harms<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/26/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Andrew Jorgensen</b> <<a href="mailto:andrew.jorgensen@gmail.com">
andrew.jorgensen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On 7/26/06, Steven Harms <<a href="mailto:thisdyingdream@gmail.com">
thisdyingdream@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> On a side note, I did not see Mr. Garrett's name on:<br>> <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/governance">http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/governance
</a><br><br>Um, that's because you didn't look carefully. The only name on that<br>particular page is Mark. Look here<br><a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/techboard">http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/techboard
</a> for Matthew's<br>name. Only Mark has veto power but Matthew certainly has more say<br>than you or I do.<br></blockquote></div><br>