On 5/29/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Thom Holwerda</b> <<a href="mailto:slakje@quicknet.nl">slakje@quicknet.nl</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> In conclusion - we *have* to make Wine-based ports as easy as possible<br>> to install and configure since they are valuable tools that Windows-<br>> folk<br>> are already familiar with. Why should people care how it was
<br>> written or<br>> what libraries and API's it uses?<br><br>I'd say the most important thing is that applications share a similar<br>look. As long as that's guaranteed, why should the end-users care?</blockquote>
<div><br>I believe GTK+/QT look is doable in Wine. I believe that there should be
wine-gtk, and wine-kde, or just wine that shares the specific theme settings. </div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Thom Holwerda
<br>---<br>Managing editor at <a href="http://www.osnews.com">http://www.osnews.com</a><br><br>--<br>ubuntu-devel mailing list<br><a href="mailto:ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br><a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel">
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>"Claret is the liquor for boys; port for men; but he who aspires to be a hero must drink brandy." – Samuel Johnson