Possibility of accepting a network-based installer of Ubuntu as an official flavor?

[Aaron Rainbolt]

Huh. TIL. That's awesome.

On 2/24/23 14:33, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 02:20:25PM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
>> This makes good sense to me. The concern I'm noticing here is that Secure
>> Boot activates a kernel lockdown mode that prohibits kexec.
> Incorrect.  It disables the old kexec syscall which doesn't have an
> interface for doing signature verification of the payload.  It does not
> disable the use of kexec as a feature.
>
-- 
Aaron Rainbolt
Lubuntu Developer
https://github.com/ArrayBolt3
https://launchpad.net/~arraybolt3
@arraybolt3:lubuntu.me on Matrix, arraybolt3 on irc.libera.chat

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0x6169B9B4248C0464.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 4853 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP public key
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20230224/619ff2ca/attachment-0001.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20230224/619ff2ca/attachment-0001.sig>