autopkgtest missed regression for kinetic

[Steve Langasek]

On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 12:57:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This is because the test failure is not a regression.

> * autopkgtest for devhelp/41.2-2: amd64: Not a regression, arm64: Not a regression, armhf: Test in progress, ppc64el: Not a regression, s390x: Not a regression

> The test has never passed; it has had neutral results and failing results,
> but by policy, proposed-migration does not treat neutral->fail as a
> migration-blocking regression, only pass->fail.  Neutral test results are
> informational only.

Having said this, I am just this moment looking at cases where britney is
treating neutral->fail as a regression.  I still believe the intended policy
is as I described, but one way or another there appear to be some bugs here
in the implementation ;)

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20220515/e71f3c9a/attachment.sig>