autopkgtest missed regression for kinetic

Julian Andres Klode julian.klode at canonical.com
Fri May 13 18:05:20 UTC 2022


On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 12:06:46PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am concerned that the excuses page is ignoring that webkit2gtk
> 2.36.1-1 caused an autopkgtest regression for devhelp.
> 
> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/d/devhelp/kinetic/amd64
> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html
> 
> The regression was correctly caught in Debian:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/webkit2gtk
> 
> I am concerned because I would expect other packages could have
> introduced regressions but been allowed in to Kinetic.

It seems the state of the 2 autopkgtest-web workers is inconsistent,
not all results were copied up on all instances.

I noticed that it retried a migration-reference/0 test after the failure
which indicated it did not allow the failure, but a later run might have
hit the different backend and hence might have a different view.

So it's unclear if that's the reason, but bdmurray is cleaning that up
right now.


-- 
debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
ubuntu core developer                              i speak de, en



More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list