Ubuntu Focal update of broken Calibre package
james.cuzella at lyraphase.com
Sat Dec 12 03:43:16 UTC 2020
I recently wanted to test out Calibre with a newer Kindle Fire tablet. It
turns out that I ran into many of the issues mentioned with the
broken 4.99.4+dfsg+really4.12.0-1build1 package version. I was able to get
this old version of Calibre working to identify the tablet on Focal with an
updated version of libmtp. This is in my PPA here:
So, knowing some packaging tricks for Ubuntu & Debian, I decided to try and
create an updated Calibre package in a PPA for Focal / 20.04.1. I ran into
the issue of first needing to backport all the build dependencies. I
started out by using the same version of Calibre ( 5.6.0+dfsg ) from the
source package in Ubuntu groovy, and then after reading this thread trying
to backport the versions from Debian bullseye & sid. So far I've been able
to backport the following:
- pyqt-builder 1.4.0+dfsg-1 and 1.6.0+dfsg-1
- sip4 4.19.24+dfsg-1
- sip5 5.3.0+dfsg-2 and 5.5.0+dfsg-1
- pyqt5-sip 12.8.1-1
Note: I also backported debhelper 13.2 in that PPA, but ended up not using
it because strict build-depends on "debhelper (=12)" is on most of the
other packages in Focal, and Soyuz / pbuilder will fail on that build
dependency. Instead, I just switched back to "debhelper (=12)" in the
source package's debian/control files.
These are in this PPA:
> Most packages I mentioned will need a rebuild and a patch to use a different
> location for PyQt5 *.sip files.
This explains exactly the issues I ran into for the main Calibre package! 😊
So far I have tried two routes to resolve the build dependency:
- sip4 4.19.24+dfsg-1 + pyqt-builder 1.4.0+dfsg-1
- Patched Calibre's setup.py to use Python3
- Patched Calibre's setup/build.py to use sip-module = "sip"
- Ran into issues with python3-sipbuilder
- It could not find the package path, as you described:
SIPing 3 files...
/usr/bin/python3.8 -c import os;
from sipbuild.tools.build import main; main(); --verbose
Querying qmake about your Qt installation...
These bindings will be built: pictureflow.
Generating the pictureflow bindings...
-c: Unable to find file "QtWidgets/QtWidgetsmod.sip"
- There was a problem with how
python3-sipbuilder's "get_package_dir" function was working.
The "sip_parts" result of the split only had 1 array item: ["sip"]
The code discards the last array item, assuming it's a filename
Therefore, it creates an empty array that gets passed to:
- sip5 5.3.0+dfsg-2 + pyqt-builder 1.4.0+dfsg-1 + pyqt5-dev
- This option required just patching Calibre's setup.py to use Python3
- Tried downgrading Build-Depends to pyqt5-dev (>=
- I became blocked at first on backporting the build dependencies for
the pyqt5-sip / PyQt5.sip and many other pyqt5 packages. Not
sure what the
issue was (I've never seen or used PyQt5 or SIP before this...
a large rabbit hole)
- sip5 5.5.0+dfsg-1 + pyqt-builder / python3-pyqtbuild 1.6.0+dfsg-1
+ pyqt5-sip / python3-pyqt5.sip
12.8.1-1 + pyqt5 5.15.2+dfsg-1 (all backported)
- Again, just added the patch Calibre's setup.py to use Python3
- This time it's missing a package: python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: Unmet build dependencies:
python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine (>= 5.12.1-4+b1)
You can see this in Debian: after I uploaded new PyQt5 (built with SIP 5) to
> unstable, immediately some packages started to fail to build from source:
> - https://bugs.debian.org/971173 (krita)
> - https://bugs.debian.org/971217 (python-poppler-qt5)
> - https://bugs.debian.org/971172 (veusz)
> And packages that were not rebuilt got runtime errors:
> - https://bugs.debian.org/971538 (qgis)
> - https://bugs.debian.org/970921 (calibre)
> So what I said is true: this requires simultaneous changes in many packages,
> even if it's just a rebuild for some of them.
I think if I or someone else here can figure out how to get
python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine to build, then Calibre may also be able to build
with this set of dependencies. Note, I'm not an "official" Debian or
Ubuntu developer and have not gone through the onboarding / mentorship
process to become one. So for now, these efforts are for a Focal targeted
PPA only. However, with some help this could be the first step towards
getting an official set into focal-backports.
I would appreciate any help with figuring out how to get that
last python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine package to be generated from the pyqt5
source package. I'm assuming this is where it comes from, given that all
the other similarly named ones were generated from that one. Also, the
Debian package site shows this as the source package:
- James Cuzella
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ubuntu-devel