SRU quality and preventing regressions

[Robie Basak]

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:28:39PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> requirement ... and indeed it's not in the wiki. So we have at least one
> example where something checked the wiki documentation as a reference,
> wiki also is easy enough to edit so there is no real reason to not do it.

Thanks. I don't think I'm actually suggesting any change in policy here
- it seems to me that what I'm asking for isn't consistently written
everywhere even though it is actually current policy (because it has
always* been asked for in at least one place). So I'll JFDI and edit
everything for clarity, including the wiki, unless someone objects.

Robie
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20170420/b41a135c/attachment-0001.pgp>