[Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Please, consider reflecting on the Canonical Contributor Agreement

[Alberto Mardegan]

On 01/04/2015 09:48 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> No, of course not.  I'm struggling to make sense of Stephen's original
> response and it seemed to make sense from that perspective.  Qt (for example)
> is clearly now a free software project and it has a CLA.  There are others as
> well.

Qt's CLA is as imbalanced as the Canonical one, isn't it? In fact, I 
would claim that's even worse, because while in Canonical's case there's 
the *risk* that the software might be re-sold under a proprietory 
license, with Qt you have the *certainty* that it's been actively sold.

Ciao,
   Alberto