Ubuntu Touch: Poppler or MuPDF as PDF renderer
Steve Langasek
steve.langasek at ubuntu.com
Sat May 18 05:17:34 UTC 2013
Hi Till,
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 01:25:12PM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> So Ghostscript is out of the question here as it is large and the PDF
> interpreter is written in PostScript. Poppler has the advantage of
> having a long history and so it should deal best with quirky files.
> MuPDF is written with lightweightness in mind, is the only free software
> which allows filling and saving PDF forms,
This doesn't sound accurate to me - I've used evince before (which is
poppler based) to fill out PDF forms and save them. Maybe this should be
checked?
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20130518/b312c551/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list