Follow Up from "Let's Discuss Interim Releases"

Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrij.ledkov at
Tue Mar 12 17:49:55 UTC 2013

On 12 March 2013 17:23, Phillip Susi <psusi at> wrote:
> On 3/9/2013 6:45 AM, Otus wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Robert Bruce Park
>> <robert.park at> wrote:
>>> Although I feel quite strongly about my support for the rolling
>>> release model, if it is rejected, we can't continue as we used to. We
>>> simply do not have the resources to support more than two releases at
>>> a time. I'd prefer to only have to support LTS+rolling, but LTS+"one
>>> interim at a time" would be an acceptable second best.
>> If you need/wish to cut down the number of supported releases all the
>> way down to two at a time (from current ~5) there are really only two
>> options:
> I am pretty sure he meant all supported LTS count as one, and the goal is to
> not have more than one non LTS supported.

LTS releases must overlap to allow for upgrades. Plus the benefit of
LTS is its longer support, e.g. even reaching beyond the next two LTS



More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list