taking Unity to the next level

Ted Gould ted at ubuntu.com
Mon Mar 4 21:35:42 UTC 2013

On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 15:35 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:

> Projecting out a year or two, I'm personally starting to run short of reasons 
> why a non-Unity desktop flavor of Ubuntu makes sense as a value proposition.  I 
> can probably build a current KDE + Debian Wheezy derivative with less work 
> than it'll take to continue to maintain anything similar withing Ubuntu.

For some derivatives that may be the case, but it would seem for Kubuntu
specifically Canonical now has vested interest in keeping the Qt stack
working really well and will start to pick up work that has been done by
Kubuntu-devs previously free'ing time to working other more KDE specific
stuff.  I don't know, seems like a golden time for Kubuntu to me.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20130304/4f61e174/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20130304/4f61e174/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list