Let's Discuss Interim Releases (and a Rolling Release)
Steve Langasek
steve.langasek at ubuntu.com
Fri Mar 1 21:23:43 UTC 2013
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 10:13:39PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2013, Colin Watson wrote:
> > The latter option (publish immediately, symlink only after passing
> > tests) would be simpler to implement and is probably the most plausible
> > way to do this; after all if you don't publish them at all on cdimage
> > then you have to invent some new way to publish them to jenkins for
> > smoke-testing. It would require something to check in on test results
> > every so often, but that probably isn't too hopelessly difficult.
> In fact, we could maintain a /latest vs. a /current; /latest would
> always be updated, but /current (or /tested, /releasable etc.) would
> only be updated when the image passes tests.
Sounds familiar:
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/livefs-build-logs/raring/ubuntu/
:-)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20130301/6d3e0d01/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list