12.10 upgrade path - Re: Let's Discuss Interim Releases (and a Rolling Release)
scott at kitterman.com
Fri Mar 1 05:38:23 UTC 2013
On Friday, March 01, 2013 12:36:43 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, March 01, 2013 06:16:18 AM Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Scott Kitterman [2013-02-28 18:24 -0500]:
> > > Perhaps it would make sense to extend 12.10 support by 6 months to give
> > > 12.10 users a decent interval to upgrade.
> > +1 on that from me as well, unless it turns out in discussions that we
> > are doing 13.04 after all, and only drop 13.10.
> No would be a good time to be discussing this change for after 14.04. Doing
> this mid LTS - LTS cycle is going to be problematic for a variety of
> reasons. If we had a year to get ready, then we might be in a reasonable
> place to decide on making a transition like this.
> I think this is a substantially more complex (in terms of understanding all
> the implications, making sure they are thought through, and including things
> in the "plan" - not necessarily just in code) than the "No more source
> packages" spec or the archive reorganization spec. How long have those
> Scott K
s/No/Now at the start of the first paragraph.
More information about the ubuntu-devel