Let's Discuss Interim Releases (and a Rolling Release)

[Michael Hall]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


On 02/28/2013 06:01 PM, Ted Gould wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 17:09 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
>>> More clearly, I think we should: * Stop making interim
>>> releases.
>> 
>> This entails also dropping freezes for the non-LTS cycles, or
>> would we still have freeze cycles during the monthly cadence?
> 
> I hope that we will.  My biggest worry with the rolling release 
> methodology is that there is no deadlines for people to work
> towards except the LTS deadlines.  This will then encourage more
> polishing and refining, with a rush to an even bigger deadline.  We
> could all say "you should be more disciplined than that," which is
> a truism, but one that seems to ignore human nature.  So I hope
> that there will be deadlines for the monthly releases that people
> can target, and use for their own milestones.
> 
> Ted
> 
> 
> 

I think we can use the 3-month UDS cycles for this, try and break down
work items so that can be done by the next UDS.

- --
Michael Hall
mhall119 at ubuntu.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRMBvQAAoJEInUYcGJgfVyW/AQAJGLNjZTesdkOo38+QVJBz/U
cnn1Gqs5Cp76/6smWqqbmal/tWwbdCjE9aoBsTxJaI5r3P4QfSyuF2++BD/8w7or
jqoPrqiW2iQ0JXRcUL3op0cAbjdRG7zx1oZYu7TSPUclAgnVRJJWxHqlppUPK3kC
frReGnbyA++ZATsIVJUU3IJTr5IkkVt0lR5ZE3Wp2jVoa9i6i2Yn4z9a1QF2wx48
nWtQXj+HeJmo55C8qtK90FrAz6OSxwtkFQggTnnRR54pQ6h3mSwBoksEGGmKGDbM
Nx5BPBABCim7TGgeFhgIDegaYyo4M3v/iQ+Zi5hCn9X8+GHXk0BaUSsBlox32ciI
cemLVKBDLRGqZyTWXnuFzKJWRISTYBvGwLGThezjgK1boxHpvwd6YdFcThGtTBGt
Yfdv+XHHajgFb14JMZqON/6UfYiBh9ixzmkvkU4680DLSuHT4r0i6eQY4WTpUOhB
aB8l1+bwmhlvXLIgxm4AC767iINj8vHJ/Y5dC4LdLgLtQXKpU2Sruzp1MRUjzRuf
3B36NXsfSL536eUsEsiwhtVkxk+fOksJk52o8wCUEKHBkBzyQkaCN+8wEKIONqXq
n4yarb/wElItMM0mkJ9OWPP3kvHomz+5K7oR6DDgqXK+zIiYgbRCRtUkJE9z8uCg
Jll4XMMIM2YekVMhKNTb
=J/wH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----