Review of current autopkgtest failures, bucket into teams

[Steve Langasek]

Hi Martin,

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 01:34:40PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> == foundations ==
> saucy-adt-pandas (regression)

It looks like Dmitry Shachnev has fixed this up already - thanks, Dmitry!

Beyond that, this is a package in universe which I don't think Foundations
should be responsible for fixing the test suite in.  I think either this
should be owned by MOTU, like other aspects of universe are, or we should
not run / not block on autopkgtests for unseeded packages.

> saucy-adt-apt-clone (regression)
> saucy-adt-eglibc (rebuild test FTBFS)
> saucy-adt-lintian (regression)
> saucy-adt-python2.7 (never worked on amd64, ok on i386)
> saucy-adt-python3.3 (never worked on amd64, ok on i386)
> saucy-adt-ubuntu-release-upgrader (regression)

I'll make sure these get taken care of.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20130725/170e3cc9/attachment-0001.pgp>