Let's Discuss Interim Releases (and a Rolling Release)
alberto.milone at canonical.com
Thu Feb 28 22:56:21 UTC 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 28/02/13 19:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yes, with my SRU hat I'm in complete agreement here. Unverified
> SRUs for interim releases every time we do an SRU to an LTS are a
> constant source of frustration for me, and make it starkly clear
> that testers (and by extension, users) don't actually care about
> interim releases to the same degree that they do about the LTS.
> That makes interim release SRUs a pretty demotivating thing to work
> on for everyone involved, because it's a lot of extra work for
> little extra benefit.
A huge +1 from me on this.
Hardware Enablement Team
Professional and Engineering Services
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the ubuntu-devel