smem report from the nexus-raring
steve.langasek at ubuntu.com
Thu Apr 25 15:57:37 UTC 2013
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:28:57AM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 28/01/2013 21:06, Sebastien Bacher a écrit :
> >We recently did a smem memory snapshot from raring, running on a
> >nexus tablet. The results have been recorded on the wiki:
> Just as a small status update, since we are wrapping the raring
> cycle I though it would be good to have an updated snapshot, so I
> did one yesterday (using the current raring iso):
> I wrote down some of the most notable differences in the "notes"
> column and added the "new"/"dropped from the list of running
> processes" at the bottom of the page. There is a quite some
> fluctuation between runs, so it's not easy to say if the small diffs
> are actual changes or just noise...
Thanks for this update, Seb!
You noted in the list of 'new' processes:
pxgsettings processes (libproxy use in geoclue and lenses?)
I've noticed this here as well; on my system this comes to 10 processes (5
shells, 5 pxgsettings instances). That looks very wrong to me. Why is this
not running as a single dbus service with multiple clients? Is this a
priority for the desktop team to look at?
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the ubuntu-devel